On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:46 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
This does break DT ABI compatibility which is partially mitigated if
these changes are backported to stable. The alternative is reverting the
referenced DT changes and coming up with different node names without
unit-addresses. Ultimately, ABI issues are platform maintainers'
decision, not mine.
I don't mind breaking the ABI for these boards since everyone I
know rebuild the DT with the kernel and boot. I don't know if
other users flash it though, so check what Sudeep says.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel