Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2021-11-22

Re: [PATCH 04/10] Coresight: Enable BC and GPR for TPDM driver

From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-11-03 19:43:06
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:38:50PM +0800, Tao Zhang wrote:
Enable GPR and Basic Counts(BC) for TPDM. Add GPR interface and
But what is GPR?  What does it stand for?  Where is this documented?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
basic control sysFS interface for TPDM. The GPR interface has RW
and RO fields for controlling external logic and mapping core
signals to an APB accessible address in the TPDM address map.

Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <redacted>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 334 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 334 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index 906776c859d6..c0a01979e42f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -276,6 +276,93 @@ struct tpdm_drvdata {
 
 static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata);
 
+static void __tpdm_enable_gpr(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
There is no need for the double underscore at the beginning of the function
name, please remove.  The same goes for __tpdm_config_bc_msr() and
__tpdm_enable_bc().
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TPDM_GPR_REGS_MAX; i++) {
+		if (!test_bit(i, drvdata->gpr->gpr_dirty))
+			continue;
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->gpr->gp_regs[i], TPDM_GPR_CR(i));
+	}
+}
+
+static void __tpdm_config_bc_msr(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!drvdata->msr_support)
Shouldn't msr_support be part of bc_dataset?  And why do we have a function for
this when an if() condition would work just as well, as it is done in
bc_trig_type below?
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TPDM_BC_MAX_MSR; i++)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->msr[i], TPDM_BC_MSR(i));
+}
+
+static void __tpdm_enable_bc(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	int i;
+	uint32_t val;
+
+	if (drvdata->bc->sat_mode)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->sat_mode,
+			    TPDM_BC_SATROLL);
+	else
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0x0, TPDM_BC_SATROLL);
+
+	if (drvdata->bc->enable_counters) {
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0xFFFFFFFF, TPDM_BC_CNTENCLR);
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->enable_counters,
+			    TPDM_BC_CNTENSET);
+	}
+	if (drvdata->bc->clear_counters)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->clear_counters,
+			    TPDM_BC_CNTENCLR);
+
+	if (drvdata->bc->enable_irq) {
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0xFFFFFFFF, TPDM_BC_INTENCLR);
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->enable_irq,
+			    TPDM_BC_INTENSET);
+	}
+	if (drvdata->bc->clear_irq)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->clear_irq,
+			    TPDM_BC_INTENCLR);
+
+	if (drvdata->bc_trig_type == TPDM_SUPPORT_TYPE_FULL) {
+		for (i = 0; i < drvdata->bc_counters_avail; i++) {
Same here - shouldn't bc_trig_type and bc_counters_avail be part of bc_dataset?
+			tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->trig_val_lo[i],
+				    TPDM_BC_TRIG_LO(i));
+			tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->trig_val_hi[i],
+				    TPDM_BC_TRIG_HI(i));
+		}
+	} else if (drvdata->bc_trig_type == TPDM_SUPPORT_TYPE_PARTIAL) {
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->trig_val_lo[0],
+			    TPDM_BC_TRIG_LO(0));
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->trig_val_hi[0],
+			    TPDM_BC_TRIG_HI(0));
+	}
+
+	if (drvdata->bc->enable_ganging)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->enable_ganging, TPDM_BC_GANG);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TPDM_BC_MAX_OVERFLOW; i++)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, drvdata->bc->overflow_val[i],
+			    TPDM_BC_OVERFLOW(i));
+
+	__tpdm_config_bc_msr(drvdata);
+
+	val = tpdm_readl(drvdata, TPDM_BC_CR);
+	if (drvdata->bc->retrieval_mode == TPDM_MODE_APB)
+		val = val | BIT(2);
+	else
+		val = val & ~BIT(2);
+	tpdm_writel(drvdata, val, TPDM_BC_CR);
+
+	val = tpdm_readl(drvdata, TPDM_BC_CR);
+	/* Set the enable bit */
+	val = val | BIT(0);
+	tpdm_writel(drvdata, val, TPDM_BC_CR);
As a whole, this function is very hard to read and understand due to the lack of
comments.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+}
+
 static void __tpdm_enable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
 {
 	TPDM_UNLOCK(drvdata);
@@ -283,6 +370,12 @@ static void __tpdm_enable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
 	if (drvdata->clk_enable)
 		tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0x1, TPDM_CLK_CTRL);
 
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_GPR, drvdata->enable_ds))
+		__tpdm_enable_gpr(drvdata);
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_BC, drvdata->enable_ds))
+		__tpdm_enable_bc(drvdata);
+
 	TPDM_LOCK(drvdata);
 }
 
@@ -307,10 +400,22 @@ static int tpdm_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __tpdm_disable_bc(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+	uint32_t config;
+
+	config = tpdm_readl(drvdata, TPDM_BC_CR);
+	config = config & ~BIT(0);
+	tpdm_writel(drvdata, config, TPDM_BC_CR);
+}
+
 static void __tpdm_disable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
 {
 	TPDM_UNLOCK(drvdata);
 
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_BC, drvdata->enable_ds))
+		__tpdm_disable_bc(drvdata);
+
Shouldn't GPRs be disabled as well?  If not why is it the case?  A comment
should be explaining what is going on.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	if (drvdata->clk_enable)
 		tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0x0, TPDM_CLK_CTRL);
 
@@ -352,6 +457,234 @@ static const struct coresight_ops tpdm_cs_ops = {
 	.source_ops	= &tpdm_source_ops,
 };
Everything related to sysfs should be in a patch on its own.
 
+static ssize_t available_datasets_show(struct device *dev,
+					    struct device_attribute *attr,
+					    char *buf)
Indentation problem here and for the rest of the patch.
+{
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	ssize_t size = 0;
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_IMPLDEF, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s",
+				  "IMPLDEF");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_DSB, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "DSB");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_CMB, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "CMB");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_TC, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "TC");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_BC, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "BC");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_GPR, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "GPR");
+
+	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_MCMB, drvdata->datasets))
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "%-8s", "MCMB");
+
+	size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size, "\n");
+	return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(available_datasets);
+
+static ssize_t enable_datasets_show(struct device *dev,
+					 struct device_attribute *attr,
+					 char *buf)
+{
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	ssize_t size;
+
+	size = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%*pb\n", TPDM_DATASETS,
+			 drvdata->enable_ds);
+
+	if (PAGE_SIZE - size < 2)
+		size = -EINVAL;
TPDM_DATASETS is set to 32 - is this realistic? 
+	else
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, 2, "\n");
...and what is going on here?
+	return size;
+}
+
+static ssize_t enable_datasets_store(struct device *dev,
+					  struct device_attribute *attr,
+					  const char *buf,
+					  size_t size)
+{
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	unsigned long val;
+	int i;
+
+	if (kstrtoul(buf, 16, &val))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
+	if (drvdata->enable) {
+		mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TPDM_DATASETS; i++) {
+		if (test_bit(i, drvdata->datasets) && (val & BIT(i)))
+			__set_bit(i, drvdata->enable_ds);
+		else
+			__clear_bit(i, drvdata->enable_ds);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
+	return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(enable_datasets);
+
+static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
+					  struct device_attribute *attr,
+					  const char *buf,
+					  size_t size)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct mcmb_dataset *mcmb_temp = NULL;
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
The coresight subsystem normally uses the hexadecimal base.
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
Shouldn't this be "if (!ret)" ? 
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
+	/* Reset all datasets to ZERO */
+	if (drvdata->gpr != NULL)
+		memset(drvdata->gpr, 0, sizeof(struct gpr_dataset));
+
+	if (drvdata->bc != NULL)
+		memset(drvdata->bc, 0, sizeof(struct bc_dataset));
+
+	if (drvdata->tc != NULL)
+		memset(drvdata->tc, 0, sizeof(struct tc_dataset));
+
+	if (drvdata->dsb != NULL)
+		memset(drvdata->dsb, 0, sizeof(struct dsb_dataset));
+
+	if (drvdata->cmb != NULL) {
+		if (drvdata->cmb->mcmb != NULL) {
+			mcmb_temp = drvdata->cmb->mcmb;
+			memset(drvdata->cmb->mcmb, 0,
+				sizeof(struct mcmb_dataset));
+			}
+
+		memset(drvdata->cmb, 0, sizeof(struct cmb_dataset));
+		drvdata->cmb->mcmb = mcmb_temp;
+	}
+	/* Init the default data */
+	tpdm_init_default_data(drvdata);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
+
+	/* Disable tpdm if enabled */
+	if (drvdata->enable)
+		coresight_disable(drvdata->csdev);
Why is this done out of the lock?
+
+	return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(reset);
+
+static ssize_t integration_test_store(struct device *dev,
+					  struct device_attribute *attr,
+					  const char *buf,
+					  size_t size)
+{
+	int i, ret = 0;
+	unsigned long val;
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (val != 1 && val != 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!drvdata->enable)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (val == 1)
+		val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_64;
+	else
+		val = ATBCNTRL_VAL_32;
+	TPDM_UNLOCK(drvdata);
+	tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0x1, TPDM_ITCNTRL);
+
+	for (i = 1; i < 5; i++)
+		tpdm_writel(drvdata, val, TPDM_ITATBCNTRL);
+
+	tpdm_writel(drvdata, 0, TPDM_ITCNTRL);
+	TPDM_LOCK(drvdata);
+	return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(integration_test);
Integration test interface should be conditional to a compile time option.  Have
a look at what was done for CTIs.
+
+static ssize_t gp_regs_show(struct device *dev,
+				 struct device_attribute *attr,
+				 char *buf)
+{
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	ssize_t size = 0;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	if (!test_bit(TPDM_DS_GPR, drvdata->datasets))
+		return -EPERM;
                return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
+	for (i = 0; i < TPDM_GPR_REGS_MAX; i++) {
+		if (!test_bit(i, drvdata->gpr->gpr_dirty))
+			continue;
+		size += scnprintf(buf + size, PAGE_SIZE - size,
+				  "Index: 0x%x Value: 0x%x\n", i,
+				  drvdata->gpr->gp_regs[i]);
This should not be - the sysfs interface requires outputs of a single line.
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
+	return size;
+}
+
+static ssize_t gp_regs_store(struct device *dev,
+				  struct device_attribute *attr,
+				  const char *buf,
+				  size_t size)
+{
+	struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+	unsigned long index, val;
+
+	if (sscanf(buf, "%lx %lx", &index, &val) != 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!test_bit(TPDM_DS_GPR, drvdata->datasets) ||
+	    index >= TPDM_GPR_REGS_MAX)
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
+	drvdata->gpr->gp_regs[index] = val;
+	__set_bit(index, drvdata->gpr->gpr_dirty);
+	mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
+	return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(gp_regs);
+
+static struct attribute *tpdm_attrs[] = {
+	&dev_attr_available_datasets.attr,
+	&dev_attr_enable_datasets.attr,
+	&dev_attr_reset.attr,
+	&dev_attr_integration_test.attr,
+	&dev_attr_gp_regs.attr,
+	NULL,
+};
All new sysfs interface need to be documented.  See here:

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-xyz

More comments to come...

Thanks,
Mathieu
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+static struct attribute_group tpdm_attr_grp = {
+	.attrs = tpdm_attrs,
+};
+static const struct attribute_group *tpdm_attr_grps[] = {
+	&tpdm_attr_grp,
+	NULL,
+};
+
 static int tpdm_datasets_alloc(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
 {
 	if (test_bit(TPDM_DS_GPR, drvdata->datasets)) {
@@ -513,6 +846,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
 	desc.ops = &tpdm_cs_ops;
 	desc.pdata = adev->dev.platform_data;
 	desc.dev = &adev->dev;
+	desc.groups = tpdm_attr_grps;
 	drvdata->csdev = coresight_register(&desc);
 	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->csdev))
 		return PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
-- 
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help