Hi Fabio, Jesse, Rob, All,

On 11/3/21 6:51 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

Hi Giulio,

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:30 PM Giulio Benetti
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

If we add every SoC we will end up having a long list for every device
driver. At the moment it would be 7 parts:
1) imxrt1020
2) imxrt1024
.
.
.
7) imxrt1170

Is it ok anyway?

As this patch adds the support for imxrt1050, I would go with
"fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc" for now.

Ok, then it's the same as pointed by Rob for lpuart[1]; @Jesse: we will 
do the same for all peripherals(more or less) since it seems there are 
little differences in the i.MXRT family.

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/D0A3E11F-FEDE-4B2D-90AB-63DFC245A935@benettiengineering.com/T/ (local)

Thanks a lot
Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel