On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:17:33AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 30/09/21 21:14, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

quoted

quoted

+   new_off_n = t_0 + off_n + (k_1 - k_0) * freq - t_1

Hi Oliver,

This won't advance the TSC values themselves, right?

Why not?  It affects the TSC offset in the vmcs, so the TSC in the VM is
advanced too.

Paolo

+4. Invoke the KVM_SET_CLOCK ioctl, providing the kvmclock nanoseconds
+   (k_0) and realtime nanoseconds (r_0) in their respective fields.
+   Ensure that the KVM_CLOCK_REALTIME flag is set in the provided
+   structure. KVM will advance the VM's kvmclock to account for elapsed
+   time since recording the clock values.

You can't advance both kvmclock (kvmclock_offset variable) and the TSCs,
which would be double counting.

So you have to either add the elapsed realtime (1) between KVM_GET_CLOCK
to kvmclock (which this patch is doing), or to the TSCs. If you do both, there
is double counting. Am i missing something?

To make it clearer: TSC clocksource is faster than kvmclock source, so
we'd rather use when possible, which is achievable with TSC scaling 
support on HW.

1: As mentioned earlier, just using the realtime clock delta between
hosts can introduce problems. So need a scheme to:

	- Find the offset between host clocks, with upper and lower
	  bounds on error.
	- Take appropriate actions based on that (for example,
	  do not use KVM_CLOCK_REALTIME flag on KVM_SET_CLOCK
	  if the delta between hosts is large).

Which can be done in userspace or kernel space... (hum, but maybe
delegating this to userspace will introduce different solutions
of the same problem?).

quoted

This (advancing the TSC values by the realtime elapsed time) would be
awesome because TSC clock_gettime() vdso is faster, and some
applications prefer to just read from TSC directly.
See "x86: kvmguest: use TSC clocksource if invariant TSC is exposed".

The advancement with this patchset only applies to kvmclock.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel