On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 09:44:05AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

-ENOENT (ie. "there is no clock") is fine to ignore for an optional
clock, other values are not supposed to be ignored and should be
escalated to the caller (e.g. -EPROBE_DEFER). Ignore -ENOENT by using
devm_clk_get_optional().

While touching this code also add an error message for the fatal errors.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
---
Hello,

compared to (implicit) v1
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914142428.57099-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (local))
this used dev_err_probe() as suggested by Martin Blumenstingl.

v1 got a "Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong [off-list ref]", I didn't add
that because of the above change.

(Hmm, my setup is broken, the b4 patch signature was done before I added this
message. I wonder if this will break the signature ...)

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/char/hw_random/meson-rng.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel