Hi Rob,

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:

quoted

DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for
this functional block.

Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
---

Notes:
    Changes v3 -> v4:
    - Fixed clock names in the example as the clock patch series is merged into
      next now
    - Add missing ports decleration to the example

    Changes v1 -> v2:
    - Move the devicetree binding from mediatek,dpi into its own binding file.

 .../display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml     | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Thanks a lot for reviewing. However I am going to recombine dpintf with
dpi as Chun-Kuang helped me realize that the fdp clock is a parent of
the pixel clock and therefore not a different clock. In the end the
clocks are the same now for both dpi and dpintf, so no need for a
separate document.

Best,
Markus

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel