Hi Markus,
On 18/10/2021 17:40, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
[ ... ]
quoted
quoted
}, {
},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_thermal_of_match);
-static void mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(void __iomem *apmixed_base)
+static void mtk_thermal_turn_on_buffer(struct mtk_thermal *mt,
+ void __iomem *apmixed_base)
{
int tmp;
- tmp = readl(apmixed_base + APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1);
- tmp &= ~(0x37);
- tmp |= 0x1;
- writel(tmp, apmixed_base + APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1);
+ if (!mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg)
+ return;
+
+ tmp = readl(apmixed_base + mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg);
+ tmp &= mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask;
+ tmp |= mt->conf->apmixed_buffer_ctl_set;
What is the goal of these two bits operations ?
mt7622 needs to unset a few bits and set one bit in this register.
mt8365 only unsets bits. For this purpose I created a _mask field to
unset bits and a _set field to set bits.
Would you suggest a different way?
No, I understand what you wanted to do. I was just unsure if there was a
trick because of the tmp |= 0;
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel