Re: [PATCH][next] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake "candiates" -> candidates
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Date: 2021-10-28 11:31:57
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 10/28/21 7:00 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:08, Colin Ian King [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
There are several spelling mistakes in variable names and in a dev_warn message. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>Applied for next, thanks!
Thanks for fixing them! Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung
Kind regards Uffequoted
--- drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c index 1f8a3c0ddfe1..c2dd29ef45c6 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c@@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ static inline u8 dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(struct dw_mci *host) return sample; } -static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates) +static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candidates) { const u8 iter = 8; u8 __c; s8 i, loc = -1; for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) { - __c = ror8(candiates, i); + __c = ror8(candidates, i); if ((__c & 0xc7) == 0xc7) { loc = i; goto out;@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates) } for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) { - __c = ror8(candiates, i); + __c = ror8(candidates, i); if ((__c & 0x83) == 0x83) { loc = i; goto out;@@ -466,11 +466,11 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates) /* * If there is no cadiates value, then it needs to return -EIO. - * If there are candiates values and don't find bset clk sample value, - * then use a first candiates clock sample value. + * If there are candidates values and don't find bset clk sample value, + * then use a first candidates clock sample value. */ for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) { - __c = ror8(candiates, i); + __c = ror8(candidates, i); if ((__c & 0x1) == 0x1) { loc = i; goto out;@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode) struct dw_mci *host = slot->host; struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv; struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc; - u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0; + u8 start_smpl, smpl, candidates = 0; s8 found; int ret = 0;@@ -496,18 +496,18 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode) smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host); if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL)) - candiates |= (1 << smpl); + candidates |= (1 << smpl); } while (start_smpl != smpl); - found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candiates); + found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candidates); if (found >= 0) { dw_mci_exynos_set_clksmpl(host, found); priv->tuned_sample = found; } else { ret = -EIO; dev_warn(&mmc->class_dev, - "There is no candiates value about clksmpl!\n"); + "There is no candidates value about clksmpl!\n"); } return ret; --2.32.0
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel