Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] spi: dw: Add Pensando Elba SoC SPI Controller bindings
From: Serge Semin <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-28 07:52:39
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-mmc, linux-spi, lkml
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:49:48AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:51:50PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote:quoted
The Pensando Elba SoC has integrated the DW APB SPI ControllerPlease add the "dt-bindings: " prefix to the patch name and discard the word "bindings" from the title as the submitting DT-patches requires: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rstquoted
Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml index d7e08b03e204..0b5ebb2ae6e7 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml@@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ properties: - renesas,r9a06g032-spi # RZ/N1D - renesas,r9a06g033-spi # RZ/N1S - const: renesas,rzn1-spi # RZ/N1quoted
+ - description: Pensando Elba SoC SPI Controller + const: pensando,elba-spiAFAICS from the driver-part of the patchset it's not enough. You've also got the syscon phandle, which needs to be reflected in the bindings. That also makes me thinking that you didn't perform the "dtbs_check" on the dts-files you were going to submit,
but for some reason discarded from this series (btw why?).
Oops. Found it. The question regarding "dtbs_check" is still actual. -Sergey
If you did you would have got an error of an unevaluated property detection. -Sergeyquoted
reg: minItems: 1 -- 2.17.1
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel