Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM: sleep: Fix runtime PM based cpuidle support
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-21 19:56:53
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 21:02, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 8:12 PM Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 18:33, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 6:17 PM Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:[cut]quoted
quoted
So in theory you could check the pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() return value and fall back to something like WFI if that's an error code.I have already tried that, but it simply got too complicated. The main issue was that runtime PM could become disabled for the device in the middle of executing the ->enter() callback.So IIUC the problem is that you cannot resume after suspending in that case. IOW, you need to guarantee that if the suspend is successful, the resume also will take place, but if the suspend fails, you basically don't care.
Exactly.
quoted
For example, if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails, I still need to make sure the reference counting in genpd becomes correct - and I can't do that using dev_pm_genpd_resume(). That's because it's not designed to be called in this "unknown" suspend phase, but should be called after the noirq phase and be properly balanced with dev_pm_genpd_suspend(). In other words, the error path didn't work out for me.It should be sufficient to call wake_up_all_idle_cpus() in the suspend path before dpm_suspend_late(), because system suspend acquires a PM-runtime reference on every device. IOW, it won't let any devices runtime-suspend, so if your power domain devices are resumed in that path, they will never suspend again in it and the pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend() in __psci_enter_domain_idle_state() becomes a reference counter management call which works regardless of whether or not PM runtime is disabled.
That sounds like a great idea, this should work too! Then the question is, how to make that call to wake_up_all_idle_cpus() to become optional - or only invoked for the cpuidle drivers that need it. In any case, I will try this out, thanks for the suggestion! Kind regards Uffe _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel