Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-dma: avoid 64-bit division in stm32_dma_get_max_width
From: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Date: 2021-10-20 10:45:30
Also in:
dmaengine, lkml
Hi Arnd, Thanks for your patch. On 10/19/21 5:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Using the % operator on a 64-bit variable is expensive and can cause a link failure: arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/dma/stm32-dma.o: in function `stm32_dma_get_max_width': stm32-dma.c:(.text+0x170): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: drivers/dma/stm32-dma.o: in function `stm32_dma_set_xfer_param': stm32-dma.c:(.text+0x1cd4): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod' As we know that we just want to check the alignment in stm32_dma_get_max_width(), there is no need for a full division, and using a simple mask is a faster replacement. In stm32_dma_set_xfer_param(), it is possible to pass a non-power-of-two length, so this does not work. I assume this would in fact be a mistake, and the hardware does not work correctly with a burst of e.g. 5 bytes on a five-byte aligned address. Change this to only allow burst transfers if the address is a multiple of the length, and that length is a power-of-two number. Fixes: b20fd5fa310c ("dmaengine: stm32-dma: fix stm32_dma_get_max_width") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c b/drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c index 2283c500f4ce..102278f7d13e 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static enum dma_slave_buswidth stm32_dma_get_max_width(u32 buf_len, max_width > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) max_width = max_width >> 1; - if (buf_addr % max_width) + if (buf_addr & (max_width - 1)) max_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE; return max_width;@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static int stm32_dma_set_xfer_param(struct stm32_dma_chan *chan, * Set memory burst size - burst not possible if address is not aligned on * the address boundary equal to the size of the transfer */ - if (buf_addr % buf_len) + if (!is_power_of_2(buf_len) || (buf_addr & (buf_len -1)))
No need to check !is_power_of_2(buf_len) here. Just after computing src_maxburst, src_best_burst = stm32_dma_get_best_burst(buf_len, src_maxburst, fifoth, src_addr_width); The configured burst (src_best_best) already take buf_len into account. So I would remove !is_power_of_2(buf_len) from the if here and fix the missing space: CHECK: spaces preferred around that '-' (ctx:WxV) #68: FILE: drivers/dma/stm32-dma.c:760: + if (!is_power_of_2(buf_len) || (buf_addr & (buf_len -1))) ^
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
src_maxburst = 1; else src_maxburst = STM32_DMA_MAX_BURST;@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static int stm32_dma_set_xfer_param(struct stm32_dma_chan *chan, * Set memory burst size - burst not possible if address is not aligned on * the address boundary equal to the size of the transfer */ - if (buf_addr % buf_len) + if (!is_power_of_2(buf_len) || (buf_addr & (buf_len -1)))
Ditto.
dst_maxburst = 1; else dst_maxburst = STM32_DMA_MAX_BURST;
With these fixes, you can add my Reviewed-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com> Tested-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com> Regards, Amelie _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel