On 19/10/2021 23:04, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:50:33PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote:

quoted

The commit d91525eb8ee6 ("ACPI, EINJ: Enhance error injection tolerance
level") fixes the issue that the ACPI/APEI can not access the PCI MCFG
address on x86 platform, but this issue can also happen on other
architectures, for instance, we got below error message on arm64 platform:
...
APEI: Can not request [mem 0x50100000-0x50100003] for APEI EINJ Trigger registers
...

This patch will try to handle this case in a more common way instead of the
original 'arch' specific solution, which will be beneficial to all the
APEI-dependent platforms after that.

Signed-off-by: Xuesong Chen <redacted>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>

The purpose of this patch is not to fix a problem reported by the
kernel test robot, so remove this tag.

Yes, will do

I know the robot found a problem with a previous version of this
patch, but we treat that the same as a code review comment.  We
normally don't explicitly credit reviewers unless it was something
major, and then it would go in the commit log, not a "Reported-by"
tag.

It makes sense to credit the kernel test robot for things found in
Linus' tree, but it's a little too aggressive about suggesting the tag
for problems with unmerged changes.

quoted

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>

This tag can only be added when Lorenzo explicitly supplies it
himself.  I do not see that on the mailing list, so please remove this
tag as well.  After Lorenzo supplies it, you can include it in future
postings as long as you don't make significant changes to the patch.

En, Lorenzo does have comments on the patch#2 and I also update that patch
according to his feedback, so why the tag is here. OK, I'll add this tag
if Lorenzo can supply it explicitly before I send the next version.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel