From: Meng Li <redacted>

In orininal code, use 2 function spin_lock() and local_irq_save() to
protect the critical zone. But when enable the kernel debug config,
there are below inconsistent lock state detected.
================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.10.63-yocto-standard #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
lock_torture_wr/226 [HC0[0]:SC1[5]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff002005b2dd80 (&p->access_spinlock){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_mem_back+0x44/0x270
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
  lock_acquire.part.0+0xf8/0x250
  lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
  _raw_spin_lock+0x68/0x90
  qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_mem_back+0x44/0x270
  ......
  cryptomgr_test+0x38/0x60
  kthread+0x158/0x164
  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x38
irq event stamp: 4498
hardirqs last  enabled at (4498): [<ffff800010fcf980>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x90/0xb0
hardirqs last disabled at (4497): [<ffff800010fcffc4>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd4/0xe0
softirqs last  enabled at (4458): [<ffff8000100108c4>] __do_softirq+0x674/0x724
softirqs last disabled at (4465): [<ffff80001005b2a4>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x190/0x19c

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&p->access_spinlock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&p->access_spinlock);
 *** DEADLOCK ***

So, in order to avoid deadlock, use the whole functinos
spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore() to protect critical zone.

Fixes: 3b2abda7d28c ("soc: fsl: dpio: Replace QMAN array mode with ring mode enqueue")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Meng Li <redacted>
---
 drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
index 845e91416b58..a56dbe4de34f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c

@@ -785,8 +785,7 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_mem_back(struct qbman_swp *s,
 	int i, num_enqueued = 0;
 	unsigned long irq_flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&s->access_spinlock);
-	local_irq_save(irq_flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&s->access_spinlock, irq_flags);
 
 	half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
 	full_mask = s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask;

@@ -797,8 +796,7 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_mem_back(struct qbman_swp *s,
 		s->eqcr.available = qm_cyc_diff(s->eqcr.pi_ring_size,
 					eqcr_ci, s->eqcr.ci);
 		if (!s->eqcr.available) {
-			local_irq_restore(irq_flags);
-			spin_unlock(&s->access_spinlock);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s->access_spinlock, irq_flags);
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}

@@ -837,8 +835,7 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_mem_back(struct qbman_swp *s,
 	dma_wmb();
 	qbman_write_register(s, QBMAN_CINH_SWP_EQCR_PI,
 				(QB_RT_BIT)|(s->eqcr.pi)|s->eqcr.pi_vb);
-	local_irq_restore(irq_flags);
-	spin_unlock(&s->access_spinlock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s->access_spinlock, irq_flags);
 
 	return num_enqueued;
 }

-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel