On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 17:40 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ */
+ err = mchp_sparx5_map_syscon(pdev, "cuphy-syscon", &ctx->cuphy_ctrl);
+ if (err && err != -ENODEV)
+ return err;
So -ENODEV should return an error if .cuphy_reg is set?
I am not sure I follow this.
If cuphy-syscon is not set then mchp_sparx5_map_syscon will return
-ENODEV. This can be ignored for sparx5 as this is not required.
If cuphy-syscon is set then if mchp_sparx5_map_syscon returns an error
then report this error.
My point was that in case of cuphy-syscon missing from the DT, the
lan966x compatible reset controller should probably throw the error
instead of ignoring it. With v4 this is not relevant any more.
regards
Philipp
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel