Re: [PATCH] tty: 8250: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-10-15 06:58:02
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-serial, lkml
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-10-15 06:58:02
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-serial, lkml
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Qing Wang wrote:
show() must not use snprintf() when formatting the value to be returned to user space.
Why must it not? What is broken in the existing code?
Fix the coccicheck warnings: WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf. Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <redacted> --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c | 6 +++--- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c index 2350fb3..082b9bd 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static ssize_t lpc_address_show(struct device *dev, addr = (aspeed_vuart_readb(vuart, ASPEED_VUART_ADDRH) << 8) | (aspeed_vuart_readb(vuart, ASPEED_VUART_ADDRL)); - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "0x%x\n", addr); + return sysfs_emit(buf - 1, "0x%x\n", addr);
what is the buf-1 thing here for? Doing a tree-wide change for this type of thing might not be wanted by many maintainers, especially if you introduce bugs like this :( greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel