Re: [PATCH RFC v1 03/11] iommu/virtio: Handle incoming page faults
From: Vivek Gautam <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-11 08:11:27
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
Hi Jean, On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:33 PM Jean-Philippe Brucker [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:21:39PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:quoted
Redirect the incoming page faults to the registered fault handler that can take the fault information such as, pasid, page request group-id, address and pasid flags. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <redacted> --- drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c index c970f386f031..fd237cad1ce5 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c@@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ /* Some architectures need an Address Space ID for each page table */ DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC1(viommu_asid_xa); +struct viommu_dev_pri_work { + struct work_struct work; + struct viommu_dev *dev; + struct virtio_iommu_fault *vfault; + u32 endpoint; +}; + struct viommu_dev { struct iommu_device iommu; struct device *dev;@@ -49,6 +56,8 @@ struct viommu_dev { struct list_head requests; void *evts; struct list_head endpoints; + struct workqueue_struct *pri_wq; + struct viommu_dev_pri_work *pri_work;IOPF already has a workqueue, so the driver doesn't need one. iommu_report_device_fault() should be fast enough to be called from the event handler.
Sure, will call iommu_report_device_fault() directly from viommu_fault_handler().
quoted
/* Device configuration */ struct iommu_domain_geometry geometry;@@ -666,6 +675,58 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev) return ret; } +static void viommu_handle_ppr(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct viommu_dev_pri_work *pwork = + container_of(work, struct viommu_dev_pri_work, work); + struct viommu_dev *viommu = pwork->dev; + struct virtio_iommu_fault *vfault = pwork->vfault; + struct viommu_endpoint *vdev; + struct viommu_ep_entry *ep; + struct iommu_fault_event fault_evt = { + .fault.type = IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQ, + }; + struct iommu_fault_page_request *prq = &fault_evt.fault.prm; + + u32 flags = le32_to_cpu(vfault->flags); + u32 prq_flags = le32_to_cpu(vfault->pr_evt_flags); + u32 endpoint = pwork->endpoint; + + memset(prq, 0, sizeof(struct iommu_fault_page_request));The fault_evt struct is already initialized
Right, I will remove this line.
quoted
+ prq->addr = le64_to_cpu(vfault->address); + + if (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_LAST_PAGE) + prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE; + if (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_PASID_VALID) { + prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID; + prq->pasid = le32_to_cpu(vfault->pasid); + prq->grpid = le32_to_cpu(vfault->grpid); + } + + if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_READ) + prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_READ; + if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_WRITE) + prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE; + if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_EXEC) + prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC; + if (flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PRIV) + prq->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV; + + list_for_each_entry(ep, &viommu->endpoints, list) { + if (ep->eid == endpoint) { + vdev = ep->vdev;
I have a question here though -
Is endpoint-ID unique across all the endpoints available per 'viommu_dev' or
per 'viommu_domain'?
If it is per 'viommu_domain' then the above list is also incorrect.
As you pointed to in the patch [1] -
[PATCH RFC v1 02/11] iommu/virtio: Maintain a list of endpoints served
by viommu_dev
I am planning to add endpoint ID into a static global xarray in
viommu_probe_device() as below:
vdev_for_each_id(i, eid, vdev) {
ret = xa_insert(&viommu_ep_ids, eid, vdev, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto err_free_dev;
}
and replace the above list traversal as below:
xa_lock_irqsave(&viommu_ep_ids, flags);
xa_for_each(&viommu_ep_ids, eid, vdev) {
if (eid == endpoint) {
ret =
iommu_report_device_fault(vdev->dev, &fault_evt);
if (ret)
dev_err(vdev->dev, "Couldn't
handle page request\n");
}
}
xa_unlock_irqrestore(&viommu_ep_ids, flags);
But using a global xarray would also be incorrect if the endpointsID are global
across 'viommu_domain'.
I need to find the correct 'viommu_endpoint' to call iommu_report_device_fault()
with the correct device.
quoted
+ break; + } + } + + if ((prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_PASID_VALID) && + (prq_flags & VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_PRQ_F_NEEDS_PASID)) + prq->flags |= IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_RESPONSE_NEEDS_PASID; + + if (iommu_report_device_fault(vdev->dev, &fault_evt)) + dev_err(vdev->dev, "Couldn't handle page request\n");An error likely means that nobody registered a fault handler, but we could display a few more details about the fault that would help debug the endpoint
Sure, will add more debug info to this log.
quoted
+} + static int viommu_fault_handler(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct virtio_iommu_fault *fault) {@@ -679,7 +740,13 @@ static int viommu_fault_handler(struct viommu_dev *viommu, u32 pasid = le32_to_cpu(fault->pasid); if (type == VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PAGE_REQ) { - dev_info(viommu->dev, "Page request fault - unhandled\n"); + dev_info_ratelimited(viommu->dev, + "Page request fault from EP %u\n", + endpoint);That's rather for debugging the virtio-iommu driver, so should be dev_dbg() (or removed entirely)
I will remove this log.
quoted
+ + viommu->pri_work->vfault = fault; + viommu->pri_work->endpoint = endpoint; + queue_work(viommu->pri_wq, &viommu->pri_work->work); return 0; }@@ -1683,6 +1750,17 @@ static int viommu_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) goto err_free_vqs; } + viommu->pri_work = kzalloc(sizeof(*viommu->pri_work), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!viommu->pri_work) + return -ENOMEM; + + viommu->pri_work->dev = viommu; + + INIT_WORK(&viommu->pri_work->work, viommu_handle_ppr); + viommu->pri_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("viommu-pri-wq"); + if (!viommu->pri_wq) + return -ENOMEM; + viommu->map_flags = VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_READ | VIRTIO_IOMMU_MAP_F_WRITE; viommu->last_domain = ~0U;diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h index accc3318ce46..53aa88e6b077 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_invalidate { #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_READ (1 << 0) #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_WRITE (1 << 1) #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_EXEC (1 << 2) +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_FAULT_F_PRIV (1 << 3)Should go in the previous patch. (I'd also prefer 'privileged' because in this context 'priv' is easily read as 'private')
Sure, will move this to the previous patch. Thanks & regards Vivek [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YUoBW13+CvIljUgc@myrica/#t (local) [snip] _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel