On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 04:37:45PM +0200, Paweł Anikiel wrote:
On SoCFPGA systems, it's desireable to have fixed numbering for
i2c busses, while being able to enable/disable them (e.g. have i2c1
be mapped to /dev/i2c-1, even though i2c0 is disabled). This can also
be achieved using devicetree aliases (see i2c_add_adapter). However,
having the driver be self-contained without relying on aliases is more
robust.
Why? This number means nothing, user space has another means to have
this being robust. Sorry, but I don't see any even close to good enough
justification, NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel