Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] KVM: arm64: Move early handlers to per-EC handlers
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-09-30 13:38:34
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 01:46:55PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Simplify the early exception handling by slicing the gigantic decoding tree into a more manageable set of functions, similar to what we have in handle_exit.c. This will also make the structure reusable for pKVM's own early exit handling. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 160 ++++++++++++++---------- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 17 +++ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 17 +++ 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h index 54abc8298ec3..0397606c0951 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h@@ -136,16 +136,7 @@ static inline void ___deactivate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - u8 ec; - u64 esr; - - esr = vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2; - ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr); - - if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW && ec != ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW) - return true; - - return __get_fault_info(esr, &vcpu->arch.fault); + return __get_fault_info(vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2, &vcpu->arch.fault); } static inline void __hyp_sve_save_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)@@ -166,8 +157,13 @@ static inline void __hyp_sve_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) write_sysreg_el1(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL1), SYS_ZCR); } -/* Check for an FPSIMD/SVE trap and handle as appropriate */ -static inline bool __hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +/* + * We trap the first access to the FP/SIMD to save the host context and + * restore the guest context lazily. + * If FP/SIMD is not implemented, handle the trap and inject an undefined + * instruction exception to the guest. Similarly for trapped SVE accesses. + */ +static bool kvm_hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) { bool sve_guest, sve_host; u8 esr_ec;@@ -185,9 +181,6 @@ static inline bool __hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } esr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu); - if (esr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD && - esr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_SVE) - return false; /* Don't handle SVE traps for non-SVE vcpus here: */ if (!sve_guest && esr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD)@@ -325,7 +318,7 @@ static inline bool esr_is_ptrauth_trap(u32 esr) DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_cpu_context, kvm_hyp_ctxt); -static inline bool __hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +static bool kvm_hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) { struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt; u64 val;@@ -350,6 +343,87 @@ static inline bool __hyp_handle_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return true; } +static bool kvm_hyp_handle_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) +{ + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_TVM) && + handle_tx2_tvm(vcpu)) + return true; + + if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v3_cpuif_trap) && + __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu) == 1) + return true; + + return false; +} + +static bool kvm_hyp_handle_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code) +{ + if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v3_cpuif_trap) && + __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(vcpu) == 1) + return true;
I think you're now calling this for the 64-bit CP15 access path, which I don't think is correct. Maybe have separate handlers for 32-bit v4 64-bit accesses? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel