[PATCH v1 3/4] selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg
flat view
STALE1858d
SUPERSEDED
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-09-13 12:46:23
Also in:
linux-kselftest
Subsystem:
arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
Revision v1 of 3 in this series.
Revisions (3)
- v1 current
- v2 [diff vs current]
- v3 [diff vs current]
We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests we execute. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
index d48d3ee1bc36..9d6ac843e651 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c@@ -329,12 +329,9 @@ static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data) return; } - if (cur_vl != data->rdvl()) - ksft_test_result_pass("%s current VL is %d\n", - data->name, ret); - else - ksft_test_result_fail("%s prctl() VL %d but RDVL is %d\n", - data->name, ret, data->rdvl()); + ksft_test_result(cur_vl == data->rdvl(), + "%s set VL %d and have VL %d\n", + data->name, cur_vl, data->rdvl()); } /* Can we set a new VL for this process? */
@@ -555,6 +552,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = { proc_write_max, prctl_get, + prctl_set_same, prctl_set, prctl_set_no_child, prctl_set_for_child,
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel