Re: [v4] PCI: Avoid unsync of LTR mechanism configuration
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-09-30 19:49:07
Also in:
linux-mediatek, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:02:24PM +0800, mingchuang qiao wrote:
Hi Bjorn, A friendly ping. Thanks.
I pointed out a couple issues, but you never responded. See below.
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 13:36 +0800, mingchuang qiao wrote:quoted
Hi Bjorn, On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 10:50 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:quoted
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:51:25PM +0800, mingchuang.qiao@mediatek. co m wrote:quoted
From: Mingchuang Qiao <redacted> In bus scan flow, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of DEVCTL2 register is configured in pci_configure_ltr(). If device and bridge both support LTR mechanism, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of device and bridge will be enabled in DEVCTL2 register. And pci_dev->ltr_path will be set as 1. If PCIe link goes down when device resets, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of bridge will change to 0 according to PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16. However, the pci_dev->ltr_path value of bridge is still 1. For following conditions, check and re-configure "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of bridge to make "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit match ltr_path value. -before configuring device's LTR for hot-remove/hot-add -before restoring device's DEVCTL2 register when restore device stateThere's definitely a bug here. The commit log should say a little more about what it is. I *think* if LTR is enabled and we suspend (putting the device in D3cold) and resume, LTR probably doesn't work after resume because LTR is disabled in the upstream bridge, which would be an obvious bug.
Here's one thing. Above I was asking for more details. In particular, how would a user notice this bug? How did *you* notice the bug?
quoted
quoted
Also, if a device with LTR enabled is hot-removed, and we hot-add a device, I think LTR will not work on the new device. Possibly also a bug, although I'm not convinced we know how to configure LTR on the new device anyway. So I'd *like* to merge the bug fix for v5.12, but I think I'll wait because of the issue below.A friendly ping. Any further process shall I make to get this patch merged?quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Mingchuang Qiao <redacted> --- changes of v4 -fix typo of commit message -rename: pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr()-quoted
pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr()changes of v3 -call pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr() in probe.c changes of v2 -modify patch description -reconfigure bridge's LTR before restoring device DEVCTL2 register --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 + drivers/pci/probe.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index b9fecc25d213..6bf65d295331 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c@@ -1437,6 +1437,24 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(structpci_dev *dev) return 0; } +void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM + struct pci_dev *bridge; + u32 ctl; + + bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); + if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) { + pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl); + if (!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) { + pci_dbg(bridge, "re-enabling LTR\n"); + pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 _L TR_EN);This pattern of updating the upstream bridge on behalf of "dev" is problematic because it's racy: CPU 1 CPU 2 ------------------- --------------------- ctl = read DEVCTL2 ctl = read(DEVCTL2) ctl |= DEVCTL2_LTR_EN ctl |= DEVCTL2_ARI write(DEVCTL2, ctl) write(DEVCTL2, ctl) Now the bridge has ARI set, but not LTR_EN. We have the same problem in the pci_enable_device() path. The most recent try at fixing it is [1].
I was hoping you would respond with "yes, I understand the problem, but don't think it's likely" or "no, this isn't actually a problem because ..." I think it *is* a problem, but we're probably unlikely to hit it, so we can probably live with it for now.
quoted
quoted
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20201218174011.340514-2-s.mir os hnichenko@yadro.com/quoted
+ } + } +#endif +} + static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev) { int i = 0;@@ -1447,6 +1465,13 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(structpci_dev *dev) if (!save_state) return; + /* + * Downstream ports reset the LTR enable bit when link goes down. + * Check and re-configure the bit here before restoring device. + * PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16. + */ + pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev); + cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0]; pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, cap[i++]); pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++]);diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h index 5c59365092fa..b3a5e5287cb7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void pci_free_cap_save_buffers(struct pci_dev*dev); bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *dev); void pci_bridge_d3_update(struct pci_dev *dev); void pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev); +void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev); static inline void pci_wakeup_event(struct pci_dev *dev) {diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 953f15abc850..ade055e9fb58 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c@@ -2132,9 +2132,16 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(structpci_dev *dev) * Complex and all intermediate Switches indicate support for LTR. * PCIe r4.0, sec 6.18. */ - if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT || - ((bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev)) && - bridge->ltr_path)) { + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) { + pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN) ; + dev->ltr_path = 1; + return; + } + + bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); + if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) { + pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev); pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN) ; dev->ltr_path = 1; -- 2.18.0_______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel