Got it. Thank you.

Yee

On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 09:35 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 04:16:13PM +0800, yee.lee@mediatek.com wrote:

quoted

From: Yee Lee <redacted>

Since scs allocation is moved to vmalloc region, the
shadow stack is protected by kasan_posion_vmalloc.
However, the vfree_atomic operation needs to access
its context for scs_free process and causes kasan error
as the dump info below.

This patch Adds kasan_unpoison_vmalloc() before vfree_atomic,
which aligns to the prior flow as using kmem_cache.
The vmalloc region will go back posioned in the following
vumap() operations.

 ==================================================================
 BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in llist_add_batch+0x60/0xd4
 Write of size 8 at addr ffff8000100b9000 by task kthreadd/2

 CPU: 0 PID: 2 Comm: kthreadd Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2-11681-
g92477dd1faa6-dirty #1
 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
 Call trace:
  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x43c
  show_stack+0x1c/0x2c
  dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
  print_address_description+0x80/0x394
  kasan_report+0x180/0x1dc
  __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x48/0x58
  llist_add_batch+0x60/0xd4
  vfree_atomic+0x60/0xe0
  scs_free+0x1dc/0x1fc
  scs_release+0xa4/0xd4
  free_task+0x30/0xe4
  __put_task_struct+0x1ec/0x2e0
  delayed_put_task_struct+0x5c/0xa0
  rcu_do_batch+0x62c/0x8a0
  rcu_core+0x60c/0xc14
  rcu_core_si+0x14/0x24
  __do_softirq+0x19c/0x68c
  irq_exit+0x118/0x2dc
  handle_domain_irq+0xcc/0x134
  gic_handle_irq+0x7c/0x1bc
  call_on_irq_stack+0x40/0x70
  do_interrupt_handler+0x78/0x9c
  el1_interrupt+0x34/0x60
  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x1c/0x2c
  el1h_64_irq+0x78/0x7c
  _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x40/0xcc
  sched_fork+0x4f0/0xb00
  copy_process+0xacc/0x3648
  kernel_clone+0x168/0x534
  kernel_thread+0x13c/0x1b0
  kthreadd+0x2bc/0x400
  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

 Memory state around the buggy address:
  ffff8000100b8f00: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
  ffff8000100b8f80: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
 >ffff8000100b9000: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
                    ^
  ffff8000100b9080: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
  ffff8000100b9100: f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8 f8
 ==================================================================

Thanks, I'll take this via the arm64 tree as we're the only use of
SCS.

One thing for future:

quoted

Suggested-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <redacted>
Reviewd-by: Will Deacon [off-list ref]

I gave an "Acked-by" and a "Tested-by" at [1], so those are the tags
you
should be using. Please don't convert them into a "Reviewed-by".

quoted

Reviewd-by: Sami Tolvanen [off-list ref]

This should be "Reviewed-by" (you have a typo).

Anyway, I'll fix these locally, no need to resend this time.

Will

[1] 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929115447.GA21631@willie-the-truck__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yjJi1VvoIbI7CZQJplT_jdN087Pkk6pzXAZ12_FpegZzaUEQutkzBjX85rub_NI$
 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel