Re: [PATCH 13/14] ARM: use .arch directives instead of assembler command line flags
From: Nick Desaulniers <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-29 18:11:49
Also in:
lkml, llvm
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:32 AM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:10 PM Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:42 AM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Nick Desaulniers <redacted> Similar to commit a6c30873ee4a ("ARM: 8989/1: use .fpu assembler directives instead of assembler arguments"). GCC and GNU binutils support setting the "sub arch" via -march=, -Wa,-march, target function attribute, and .arch assembler directive. Clang's integrated assembler does not support -Wa,-march (and the logic to overrule one when multiple of the above are used), and this can cause annoying warnings such as: clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-march=armv6k' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]Note, the above lack of support was fixed in clang-13. That said, both Clang and GCC defer to -Wa,-march when -march is also present, so clang is still correct that -march is ignored. Thanks for resending; this is still helpful for earlier releases of clang that we still support.The -Wunused-command-line-argument warning also caused a build failure for me when building with 'make W=1', and I think there are cases where the flags from the command line are contradictory.
There's also -Werror now, which is hurting allmodconfig builds.
Isn't the patch also needed for LTO? All I know is that with this applied it all builds, but without it I run into link failures.
We don't support LTO on 32b ARM, yet. I would be interested in getting that support working.
I can dig more into the specific failures, but overall I think this is the right thing to do anyway.
I agree. I was just adding additional context to the commit message via my initial reply. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel