On 12:54-20210924, Suman Anna wrote:
Hi Sinthu,
On 9/24/21 12:25 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
quoted
On 9/24/21 11:29 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
quoted
On 11:10-20210924, Suman Anna wrote:
quoted
Hi Sinthu,
On 9/17/21 4:54 AM, Sinthu Raja wrote:
quoted
From: Sinthu Raja <redacted>
The example includes a board-specific compatible property, this is
wrong as the example should be board agnostic and gets in the way of
additions for newer platforms. Replace the same with a generic soc
node.
What board specific property? This description looks wrong.
Can you please repost dropping the Fixes line, and modifying the patch
description as follows:
dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-dsp: Cleanup SoC compatible from DT example
The K3 DSP binding example used the root-node with a SoC compatible
property originally to address the dt_binding_check warnings resulting
from using a value of 2 for #address-cells and #size-cells as per most
common usage on K3 SoCs. Clean this up and replace it with a generic soc
node to keep it agnostic of the SoC or board compatibles that are outside
the scope of this binding.
This looks good to me as well. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D)/Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel