Re: [PATCH] regulator: pwm-regulator: Make use of the helper function dev_err_probe()

Hi Neil,

On Mon, 20 Sept 2021 at 13:56, Neil Armstrong [off-list ref] wrote:

On 19/09/2021 23:11, Anand Moon wrote:

quoted

devm_regulator_register can return -EPROBE_DEFER if the
regulator is not ready yet. Use dev_err_probe() for
pwm regulator resources to indicate the deferral reason
when waiting for the resource to come up.

Fixes: 0cd71b9a43ad ("regulator: pwm: Don't warn on probe deferral")

Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <redacted>
---
 drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index 7629476d94ae..451e57a739f8 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c

@@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                                          &drvdata->desc, &config);
      if (IS_ERR(regulator)) {
              ret = PTR_ERR(regulator);
-             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register regulator %s: %d\n",
-                     drvdata->desc.name, ret);
-             return ret;
+             return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
+                                  "Failed to register regulator %s: %d\n",
+                                  drvdata->desc.name, ret);

No need to keep ret and print it since it will be printed by dev_err_probe, pass directly PTR_ERR(regulator) and drop the ": %d" from the error string.

Neil

Thanks for the input but it's a wrong fix I meant to fix another probe
defer with *devm_pwm_get*
I will correct this in the next version..

Thanks
-Anand

quoted

      }

      return 0;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel