Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: leds: Convert register-bit-led binding to DT schema
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-09-14 16:22:43
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-leds, lkml
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:41:31AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 9:28 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Convert the register-bit-led binding to DT schema format. As the example just repeats nearly identical nodes, trim it down to a few nodes and use some documented values for 'linux,default-trigger'. Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted> Cc: Pavel Machek <redacted> Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>Thanks for doing this!quoted
v2: - Drop undocumented linux,default-trigger valuesWill this lead to warnings? People tend to want to use these.
Yes. The list for linux,default-trigger was purposely limited rather than just throw in all the occurrences we could find. It's kind of a mess with similar or overlapping names. There's other and better ways to do this now. There's the 'function' property and you can link to another device.
(Possibly we could actually create operating-system independent triggers that make sense on any system. But it's another can of worms we don't need to open today.)quoted
+ enum: + [ 0x1, 0x2, 0x4, 0x8, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80, 0x100, 0x200, 0x400, 0x800, + 0x1000, 0x2000, 0x4000, 0x8000, 0x10000, 0x20000, 0x40000, 0x80000, + 0x100000, 0x200000, 0x400000, 0x800000, 0x1000000, 0x2000000, 0x4000000, + 0x8000000, 0x10000000, 0x20000000, 0x40000000, 0x80000000 ]That's an interesting looking enum :D But I can't think of anything better, so:
We could define our own type, but I can't say I recall the need for this elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Thanks. Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel