Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: imx: encapsulate the clock enable into one standalone function
flat view
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-09-08 08:47:54
Also in:
linux-pci, lkml
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.09.2021 um 14:59 +0800 schrieb Richard Zhu:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
No function changes, just encapsulate the i.MX PCIe clocks enable operations into one standalone function Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c index 80fc98acf097..0264432e4c4a 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ struct imx6_pcie { #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_DATA_EN BIT(5) #define PHY_RX_OVRD_IN_LO_RX_PLL_EN BIT(3) +static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie); +
I don't think this is strictly needed. Can you just move the placement of the new imx6_pcie_clk_enable function in the file, such that we can avoid the forward declaration?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static int pcie_phy_poll_ack(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, bool exp_val) { struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci;@@ -498,33 +500,12 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) } } - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_phy clock\n"); - goto err_pcie_phy; - } - - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus); + ret = imx6_pcie_clk_enable(imx6_pcie); if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_bus clock\n"); - goto err_pcie_bus; + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clocks\n"); + goto err_clks; } - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clock\n"); - goto err_pcie; - } - - ret = imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie ref clock\n"); - goto err_ref_clk; - } - - /* allow the clocks to stabilize */ - usleep_range(200, 500); - /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio,@@ -578,13 +559,7 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) return; -err_ref_clk: - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie); -err_pcie: - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus); -err_pcie_bus: - clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy); -err_pcie_phy: +err_clks: if (imx6_pcie->vpcie && regulator_is_enabled(imx6_pcie->vpcie) > 0) { ret = regulator_disable(imx6_pcie->vpcie); if (ret)@@ -914,6 +889,51 @@ static void imx6_pcie_pm_turnoff(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) usleep_range(1000, 10000); } +static int imx6_pcie_clk_enable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) +{ + struct dw_pcie *pci = imx6_pcie->pci; + struct device *dev = pci->dev; + int ret; + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_phy clock\n"); + return ret; + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie_bus clock\n"); + goto err_pcie_bus; + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx6_pcie->pcie); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie clock\n"); + goto err_pcie; + } + + ret = imx6_pcie_enable_ref_clk(imx6_pcie); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "unable to enable pcie ref clock\n"); + goto err_ref_clk; + } + + /* allow the clocks to stabilize */ + usleep_range(200, 500); + return 0; + +err_ref_clk: + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie); +err_pcie: + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_bus); +err_pcie_bus: + clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie_phy); + + return ret; +
Superfluous newline. Regards, Lucas
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+} + static void imx6_pcie_clk_disable(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) { clk_disable_unprepare(imx6_pcie->pcie);
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel