On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:58 PM Shengjiu Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Rob

On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 12:50 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:42 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:29:36 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

quoted

Define the compatible string and properties needed by imx_dsp_rproc
driver.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <redacted>
---
 .../remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml         | 131 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

I take that back. What's the difference with this binding and
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml?

Some devices, but two kinds of driver. one for remoteproc
framework,  another one is for ALSA.
So should I merge fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml to fsl,dsp.yaml?

You can have 100 drivers for all I care, but it's 1 DT binding for 1
piece of h/w.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel