Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] kselftest/arm64: SVE signal handling tests

On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:42:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

Currently we have no real tests for SVE signal handling (though the
stress test does trigger the code paths as it regularly sends signals to
the test processes).  Add some basic coverage, this is very much
incomplete but it's more coverage than we currently have, a TODO file is
included with some omissions that occurred to me.

Mark Brown (6):
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add SVE to the set of features we can check
    for
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Support signal frames with SVE register data
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Check SVE signal frame shows expected vector
    length
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Verify that signals can't change the SVE
    vector length
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add test case for SVE register state in
    signals
  kselftest/arm64: signal: Add a TODO list for signal handling tests

[...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!

[1/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add SVE to the set of features we can check for
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d4e4dc4fab68
[2/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Support signal frames with SVE register data
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ace19b1845a5
[3/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Check SVE signal frame shows expected vector length
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c1f67a19c12e
[4/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Verify that signals can't change the SVE vector length
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d25ac50ce8f7
[5/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add test case for SVE register state in signals
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/5262b216f4a9
[6/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add a TODO list for signal handling tests
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/fa5ca80db89e

-- 
Catalin


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel