On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:43 AM Marcelo Tosatti [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:11:25AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
quoted
Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
TSC.
Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.
Oliver,
Can you please describe the race in more detail?
Is it about host TSC going unstable VS parallel KVM_GET_CLOCK ?
Yeah, pretty much any event that causes us to set use_master_clock =
false could interleave with the KVM_GET_CLOCK ioctl. A guest could
kick its TSCs out of sync, for example, to cause this too. AFAICT, KVM
serializes the write side (pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy()) with
pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, as it should.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel