On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 03:32:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 03:01:10PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
quoted
Indeed I've thought before that it would be nice if regulators worked like
GPIOs, where the absence of an optional one does give you NULL, and most of
the API is also NULL-safe. Probably a pretty big job though...
It also encourages *really* bad practice with error handling
I'm not necessarily 100% positive what you mean by this. I think you
mean you don't like when people pass invalid pointers to free functions?
But making regulator code NULL-safe wouldn't affect error handling
because NULL wouldn't be an error.
p = get_optional();
if (IS_ERR(p))
return PTR_ERR(p);
enable(p);
...
disable(p);
It all works nicely.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel