Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:59:45PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Aug 25 2021, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:48:26 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:

quoted

DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
---
v7:

  Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)

  Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)

  Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)

  Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)

  List 'reg' as required

v6:

  Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)

  Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)

v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
    Andersson, Kathiravan T)

v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)

v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)

v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
/example-0/syscon@1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']

What can I do about that? Is it because qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 is documented
in a non-yaml plain .txt file?

No, it is not documented at all.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel