Re: [PATCH 5/7] dt-bindings: soc: imx: add missing anatop binding
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-02 15:02:14
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:38 AM Dong Aisheng [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rob, On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:49 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 04:25:34PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:quoted
Anatop is a system combo module which supports various analog functions like PLL, Regulators, LDOs, Sensors and etc. This binding doc is generated based on the exist usage in dts in order to fix dt schema check failures. Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> --- .../bindings/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yaml | 68 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yamldiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f379d960f527 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/imx/fsl,anatop.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Freescale Anatop binding + +maintainers: + - Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> + +properties: + compatible: + oneOf: + - items: + - const: fsl,imx6q-anatop + - const: syscon + - const: simple-mfd + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx6sl-anatop + - fsl,imx6sll-anatop + - fsl,imx6sx-anatop + - fsl,imx6ul-anatop + - fsl,imx7d-anatop + - const: fsl,imx6q-anatop + - const: syscon + - const: simple-mfd + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8mq-anatop + - fsl,imx8mm-anatop + - fsl,vf610-anatop + - const: syscon + - items: + - enum: + - fsl,imx8mn-anatop + - fsl,imx8mp-anatop + - const: fsl,imx8mm-anatop + - const: syscon + + reg: + maxItems: 1 + + interrupts: + items: + - description: Temperature Sensor + - description: PMU interrupt 1 + - description: PMU interrupt 2 + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 3Don't need maxItems.Got itquoted
quoted
+ +required: + - compatible + - reg + +additionalProperties: trueThis should be the case only for common schemas used by other schemas.Like iomuxc-gpr in patch 6, the problem is that for those nodes with simple-mfd backwards compatibility, there could be possibly some random subnodes since there're generic combo registers. That's why i use additionalProperties true to cover it. Do you think it's ok?
No, because all that should be reviewed rather than random subnodes. Otherwise, how do we validate them? Rob _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel