On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 10:34 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 28-08-21, 23:01, Hector Yuan wrote:

quoted

From: "Hector.Yuan" <redacted>

Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu
to specific performance domain.

Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <redacted>
---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h |   39
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9fd7194..4916d70 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h

@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kobject.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>

@@ -1036,6 +1038,43 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(const struct

cpumask *cpus,
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int index,
const char *list_name,
+						     const char
*cell_name,
+						     struct cpumask
*cpumask)

What happened with the discussion we had about returning index and
passing CPU
there ?

Hi, Viresh, sorry for this, I didn't upload the correct version of
cpufreq.h. Should I just go v15 or you want to do some review for other
part of my patches? Thanks.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel