On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 13:28 +0800, David Ahern wrote:
On 8/25/21 11:46 PM, Rocco Yue wrote:
quoted
@@ -5651,6 +5654,9 @@ static int inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_dev *idev,
if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_INET6_ADDR_GEN_MODE, idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode))
goto nla_put_failure;
+ if (nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU, idev->ra_mtu))
I should have seen this earlier. The intent here is to only notify
userspace if the RA contains an MTU in which case this should be
if (idev->ra_mtu &&
nla_put_u32(skb, IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU, idev->ra_mtu))
Hi David,
Thanks for your pretty suggestion.
When ra_mtu = 0, notify userspace is really unnecessary. At first
I did this because when userspace get ra_mtu = 0 through getlink,
then the corresponding operation can be performed.
After adding the restriction of "idev->ra_mtu", I think userspace can
judge whether the mtu option is carried in the RA by judging whether it
can be parsed to IFLA_INET6_RA_MTU after getlink, and perform the
corresponding operation.
I will push the next version.
and in which case idev->ra_mtu should be initialized to 0 explicitly,
not U32_MIN.
will do.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel