Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] remoteproc: meson-mx-ao-arc: Add a driver for the AO ARC remote procesor
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-08-23 15:29:35
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-remoteproc, lkml
On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 10:15:06AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 11:03:57PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:quoted
Hi Mathieu, thanks for taking the time to look into this! (I will address any of your comments that I am not mentioning in this email anymore. Thanks a lot for the suggestions!) On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:58 PM Mathieu Poirier [off-list ref] wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
+ writel(FIELD_PREP(AO_REMAP_REG0_REMAP_AHB_SRAM_BITS_17_14_FOR_ARM_CPU, + priv->sram_pa >> 14),Indentation problemThe idea here is to align priv->sram_pa with AO_REMAP_REG0... which are both arguments to FIELD_PREPRight, this is what I would have expected. When I applied the patch on my side "priv->sram_pa ..." was aligned wiht the 'M' of "AO_REMAP_ ...".quoted
Maybe using something like this will make that easier to read: tmp = FIELD_PREP(AO_REMAP_REG0_REMAP_AHB_SRAM_BITS_17_14_FOR_ARM_CPU, priv->sram_pa >> 14); writel(tmp, priv->remap_base + AO_REMAP_REG0);I think the main problem is that AO_REMAP_REG0_REMAP_AHB_SRAM_BITS_17_14_FOR_ARM_CPU is simply too long. I suggest making is shorter and add a comment to describe exactly what it does.quoted
What do you think: leave it as is or use a separate variable? [...]quoted
quoted
+ usleep_range(10, 100);I've seen this kind of mysterious timeouts in other patchset based vendor trees. You likely don't know why it is needed so I won't ask.unfortunately this is also the case here [...]quoted
quoted
+ priv->arc_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(priv->arc_reset)) {Function __reset_control_get() in __devm_reset_control_get() can return NULL so this should be IS_ERR_OR_NULL().The logic in there is: return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-...);Ok, so you meant to do that. And I just checked reset_control_reset() and it does account for a NULL parameter. I'm good with this one but add a comment to make sure future readers don't think you've omitted to properly deal with the NULL return value.quoted
I am requesting a mandatory reset line here, so reset core will never return NULL See also [0]Indeed, I've read that too. Nonetheless __reset_control_get() can return NULL by way of __reset_control_get_from_lookup().
You are correct, in your case checking for IS_ERR() is sufficient.
quoted
For this reason I am not planning to change this [...]quoted
This driver is squeaky clean. With the above: Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>awesome, thank you! Best regards, Martin [0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.14-rc4/source/include/linux/reset.h#L227
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel