On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:05 PM Doug Anderson [off-list ref] wrote:
I guess one minor nit (now that I look back on the veyron patch where
I mentioned it explicitly in the commit message) is that on the veyron
ones we sorted this down at the bottom with the other pinctrl stuff
instead of sorting it alphabetically with everything else. I'll let
Heiko say which he likes better.
Huh, didn't notice that semi-convention. I can sort it however Heiko prefers.
I also notice for veyron that we had a second "ABI" exception for the
recovery mode pin, but I believe that goes through a different
mechanism now so we're good there.
I believe the recovery mode pin is dropped from recent designs (don't
quote me in general on that), and there's a different mechanism used
just to get the at-boot-time "recovery mode" state directly from the
firmware.
Even though I didn't do a line-by-line review, I'll still give:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
...though it's possible an "Acked-by" would be more in the spirit of
that? Not sure...
Thanks!
Brian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel