On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 15:50 +0800, Eizan Miyamoto wrote:

Hi Houlong,

Thank you for your review on this series, it is much appreciated.

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:53 PM houlong wei <houlong.wei@mediatek.com

quoted

wrote:
Is your removing "mediatek,vpu" necessary for this series "Refactor
MTK
MDP driver into core/components" ?

Removing it is not strictly necessary for the series to function, I
will re-upload the series and omit the following changes:
- [PATCH v6 8/9] dts: mtk-mdp: remove mediatek,vpu property from
primary MDP device
- [PATCH v6 9/9] dt-bindings: mediatek: remove vpu requirement from
mtk-mdp

Do please let me know if you meant something different.

Thanks,

Eizan

Hi Eizan,

Thanks for your help and effort. It's exactly what I expressed.

Regards,
Houlong

quoted

In some MediaTek projects (not upstream yet), the device-tree node
name
"vpu" may be changed to something like "vpu0", "vpu1" or other
name,
which depends on the implementation of "mtk-vpu" driver. We can
specify
the different phandle to "mediatek,vpu" in .dtsi file. If we use
of_find_node_by_name() to get the vpu_node, we have to modify the
name
string in different project.
If the answer of my previous questions is "No", I prefer to slow
down
the modification of removing "mediatek,vpu".

Sorry for late reply.

Regards,
Houlong

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel