On 8/10/21 7:01 PM, Will Deacon wrote:

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:36:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

quoted

ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted>
---
This applies on v5.14-rc5

 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c      | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c               | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c           | 6 +++---
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Please can you split this with the KVM parts in their own patch?

Sure, will do.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel