On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 02:14:35 +0100,
Oliver Upton [off-list ref] wrote:
The only other sane idea that I could come up with is providing this
information to the kernel through DT, although that would leave ACPI
systems behind.
It also has the disadvantage that a large number of DT timer nodes are
a mess of cargo-culted, copy-pasted idioms, and that adding another
property would only make it worse. I'm more confident with something
that can be either:
- checked from EL2 using CNTVOFF, which is complicated, doesn't work
at EL1, and leaves us in a weird state if we have different counter
width views in the system (BL is such a wonderful concept)
- or computed from first principle based on the requirements of the
architecture.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel