Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: arm_scmi: Free mailbox channels if probe fails
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date: 2021-08-05 10:54:35
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 02:19:59PM -0700, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
quoted hunk
Mailbox channels for the base protocol are setup during probe. There can be a scenario where probe fails to acquire the base protocol due to a timeout leading to cleaning up of all device managed memory including the scmi_mailbox structure setup during mailbox_chan_setup function. [ 12.735104]arm-scmi soc:qcom,scmi: timed out in resp(caller: version_get+0x84/0x140) [ 12.735224]arm-scmi soc:qcom,scmi: unable to communicate with SCMI [ 12.735947]arm-scmi: probe of soc:qcom,scmi failed with error -110 Now when a message arrives at cpu slightly after the timeout, the mailbox controller will try to call the rx_callback of the client and might end up accessing freed memory. [ 12.758363][ C0] Call trace: [ 12.758367][ C0] rx_callback+0x24/0x160 [ 12.758372][ C0] mbox_chan_received_data+0x44/0x94 [ 12.758386][ C0] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xd4/0x240 This patch frees the mailbox channels setup during probe and adds some more error handling in case the probe fails. Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <redacted> --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index 9b2e8d4..ead3bd3 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c@@ -1390,6 +1390,21 @@ void scmi_protocol_device_unrequest(const struct scmi_device_id *id_table) mutex_unlock(&scmi_requested_devices_mtx); }
Hi,
quoted hunk
+static int scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(struct scmi_info *info) +{ + int ret; + struct idr *idr = &info->tx_idr; + + ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr); + idr_destroy(&info->tx_idr); + + idr = &info->rx_idr; + ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr); + idr_destroy(&info->rx_idr); + + return ret; +} + static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { int ret;@@ -1430,7 +1445,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = scmi_xfer_info_init(info); if (ret) - return ret; + goto clear_txrx_setup; if (scmi_notification_init(handle)) dev_err(dev, "SCMI Notifications NOT available.\n");@@ -1443,7 +1458,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = scmi_protocol_acquire(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n"); - return ret; + goto notification_exit; } mutex_lock(&scmi_list_mutex);@@ -1482,6 +1497,12 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } return 0; + +notification_exit: + scmi_notification_exit(&info->handle); +clear_txrx_setup: + scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(info); + return ret; } void scmi_free_channel(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct idr *idr, int id)@@ -1493,7 +1514,6 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { int ret = 0, id; struct scmi_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - struct idr *idr = &info->tx_idr; struct device_node *child; mutex_lock(&scmi_list_mutex);@@ -1517,14 +1537,7 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) idr_destroy(&info->active_protocols); /* Safe to free channels since no more users */ - ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr); - idr_destroy(&info->tx_idr); - - idr = &info->rx_idr; - ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr); - idr_destroy(&info->rx_idr); - - return ret; + return scmi_cleanup_txrx_channels(info); }
Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> (Re-tested on for-next/scmi on top of virtio-scmi series) Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel