Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] selftests: KVM: Test physical counter offsetting
From: Andrew Jones <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-21 16:48:12
Also in:
kvm, kvmarm
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:49:48PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Test that userpace adjustment of the guest physical counter-timer results in the correct view of within the guest. Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <redacted> --- .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 12 ++++++++ .../kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h index 3168cdbae6ee..7f53d90e9512 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h@@ -141,4 +141,16 @@ static inline uint64_t read_cntvct_ordered(void) return r; } +static inline uint64_t read_cntpct_ordered(void) +{ + uint64_t r; + + __asm__ __volatile__("isb\n\t" + "mrs %0, cntpct_el0\n\t" + "isb\n\t" + : "=r"(r)); + + return r; +} + #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c index 88ad997f5b69..3eed9dcb7693 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/system_counter_offset_test.c@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static uint64_t host_read_guest_system_counter(struct test_case *test) enum arch_counter { VIRTUAL, + PHYSICAL, }; struct test_case {@@ -68,23 +69,41 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = { { .counter = VIRTUAL, .offset = 0 }, { .counter = VIRTUAL, .offset = 180 * NSEC_PER_SEC }, { .counter = VIRTUAL, .offset = -180 * NSEC_PER_SEC }, + { .counter = PHYSICAL, .offset = 0 }, + { .counter = PHYSICAL, .offset = 180 * NSEC_PER_SEC }, + { .counter = PHYSICAL, .offset = -180 * NSEC_PER_SEC }, }; static void check_preconditions(struct kvm_vm *vm) { if (!_vcpu_has_device_attr(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_CTRL, - KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_VTIMER)) + KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_VTIMER) && + !_vcpu_has_device_attr(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_CTRL, + KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_PTIMER)) return; - print_skip("KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_VTIMER not supported; skipping test"); + print_skip("KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_{VTIMER,PTIMER} not supported; skipping test"); exit(KSFT_SKIP); } static void setup_system_counter(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct test_case *test) { + u64 attr = 0; + + switch (test->counter) { + case VIRTUAL: + attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_VTIMER; + break; + case PHYSICAL: + attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_PTIMER; + break; + default: + TEST_ASSERT(false, "unrecognized counter index %u", + test->counter); + } + vcpu_access_device_attr(vm, VCPU_ID, KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_CTRL, - KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_OFFSET_VTIMER, &test->offset, - true); + attr, &test->offset, true); } static uint64_t guest_read_system_counter(struct test_case *test)@@ -92,6 +111,8 @@ static uint64_t guest_read_system_counter(struct test_case *test) switch (test->counter) { case VIRTUAL: return read_cntvct_ordered(); + case PHYSICAL: + return read_cntpct_ordered(); default: GUEST_ASSERT(0); }-- 2.32.0.402.g57bb445576-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <redacted> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel