The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-alti6p.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp-prtwd3.dts | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-tqma6.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The following warning is seen when the SPI GPIO driver probes:
gpio-expander@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
The reason for this warning is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-sdb.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:57AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Hi Shawn,
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 1:57 AM Oleksij Rempel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
quoted
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 10:27:13AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 1:57 AM Oleksij Rempel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
quoted
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:23 PM Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
Should we have Fixes tags for the patches?
As this does not change the functionality, I did not put a Fixes tag.
It will only fix a warning like this:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
IMHO it is OK to apply them without a Fixes tag.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:28:08PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:23 PM Shawn Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Should we have Fixes tags for the patches?
As this does not change the functionality, I did not put a Fixes tag.
It will only fix a warning like this:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
IMHO it is OK to apply them without a Fixes tag.
Okay, then I assume it applies to imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som and
imx8mm-venice patches as well?
Shawn
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:57AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
...
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
So the commit log was written twice? I will fix it up.
Shawn
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:36:56AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
The conversion of the spi-imx driver to use GPIO descriptors
in commit 8cdcd8aeee28 ("spi: imx/fsl-lpspi: Convert to GPIO descriptors")
helped to detect the following SPI chipselect polarity mismatch on an
imx6q-sabresd for example:
[ 4.854337] m25p80@0 enforce active low on chipselect handle
Prior to the above commit, the chipselect polarity passed via cs-gpios
property was ignored and considered active-low.
The reason for such mismatch is clearly explained in the comments inside
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c:
* SPI children have active low chip selects
* by default. This can be specified negatively
* by just omitting "spi-cs-high" in the
* device node, or actively by tagging on
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW as flag in the device
* tree. If the line is simultaneously
* tagged as active low in the device tree
* and has the "spi-cs-high" set, we get a
* conflict and the "spi-cs-high" flag will
* take precedence.
To properly represent the SPI chipselect polarity, change it to active-low
when the "spi-cs-high" property is absent.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>