Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-28

Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: ixp4xx: Add DT bindings

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-28 16:14:57
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-ide

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:02:41AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This adds device tree bindings for the Intel IXP4xx compact flash card
interface.

Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
---
 .../ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml       | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b254be858de6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/ata/intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Intel IXP4xx CompactFlash Card Controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
+
+description: |
+  The IXP4xx network processors have a CompactFlash interface that presents
+  a CompactFlash card to the system as a true IDE (parallell ATA) device. The
typo. (you can setup checkpatch.pl to do spell checking)
+  device is always connected to the expansion bus of the IXP4xx SoCs using one
+  or two chip select areas and address translating logic on the board. The
+  node must be placed inside a chip select node on the IXP4xx expansion bus.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash
+
+  reg:
+    minItems: 2
+    maxItems: 2
What is each entry?
+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - interrupts
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pata-common.yaml#
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+
+    bus@c4000000 {
+      compatible = "intel,ixp43x-expansion-bus-controller", "syscon";
+      reg = <0xc4000000 0x1000>;
+      native-endian;
+      #address-cells = <2>;
+      #size-cells = <1>;
+      ranges = <0 0x0 0x50000000 0x01000000>, <1 0x0 0x51000000 0x01000000>;
+      dma-ranges = <0 0x0 0x50000000 0x01000000>, <1 0x0 0x51000000 0x01000000>;
+      ide@1,0 {
+        compatible = "intel,ixp4xx-compact-flash";
+        intel,ixp4xx-eb-t1 = <3>;
+        intel,ixp4xx-eb-t2 = <3>;
Can you omit these? Otherwise, this will start failing soon as 
unevaluatedProperties is implemented (I have a test branch). Or you need 
to handle child node properties as discussed.
+        reg = <1 0x00000000 0x1000>, <1 0x00040000 0x1000>;
+        interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>;
+        interrupts = <12 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+      };
+    };
+
+...
-- 
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help