Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] coresight: trbe: Unify the enabling sequence
From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-30 05:39:56
Also in:
lkml
On 7/23/21 6:16 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Unify the sequence of enabling the TRBE. We do this from event_start and also from the TRBE IRQ handler. Lets move this to a common helper. The only minor functional change is returning an error when we fail to enable the TRBE. This should be handled already. Cc: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Mike Leach <redacted> Cc: Leo Yan <redacted> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 34 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c index d50f142e86d1..6d6aad171c72 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c@@ -632,6 +632,20 @@ static unsigned long arm_trbe_update_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev, return size; } +static int __arm_trbe_enable(struct trbe_buf *buf, + struct perf_output_handle *handle) +{ + buf->trbe_limit = compute_trbe_buffer_limit(handle); + buf->trbe_write = buf->trbe_base + PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, buf); + if (buf->trbe_limit == buf->trbe_base) { + trbe_stop_and_truncate_event(handle); + return -ENOSPC; + } + *this_cpu_ptr(buf->cpudata->drvdata->handle) = handle; + trbe_enable_hw(buf); + return 0; +} + static int arm_trbe_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode, void *data) { struct trbe_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);@@ -648,14 +662,8 @@ static int arm_trbe_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode, void *data)
There is this (now) redundant assignment which needs to be dropped. *this_cpu_ptr(buf->cpudata->drvdata->handle) = handle;
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
cpudata->buf = buf; cpudata->mode = mode; buf->cpudata = cpudata;> - buf->trbe_limit = compute_trbe_buffer_limit(handle); - buf->trbe_write = buf->trbe_base + PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, buf); - if (buf->trbe_limit == buf->trbe_base) { - trbe_stop_and_truncate_event(handle); - return 0; - } - trbe_enable_hw(buf); - return 0; + + return __arm_trbe_enable(buf, handle); } static int arm_trbe_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev)@@ -722,14 +730,8 @@ static void trbe_handle_overflow(struct perf_output_handle *handle) *this_cpu_ptr(buf->cpudata->drvdata->handle) = NULL; return; } - buf->trbe_limit = compute_trbe_buffer_limit(handle); - buf->trbe_write = buf->trbe_base + PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, buf); - if (buf->trbe_limit == buf->trbe_base) { - trbe_stop_and_truncate_event(handle); - return; - } - *this_cpu_ptr(buf->cpudata->drvdata->handle) = handle; - trbe_enable_hw(buf); + + __arm_trbe_enable(buf, handle); } static bool is_perf_trbe(struct perf_output_handle *handle)
With that, this clean up makes sense. Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel