Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness
From: chenxiang (M) <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-30 01:21:28
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
在 2021/7/29 18:59, Robin Murphy 写道:
On 2021-07-29 03:55, chenxiang (M) wrote:quoted
Hi Robin, 在 2021/7/28 23:58, Robin Murphy 写道:quoted
Hi all, Here's v2 where things start to look more realistic, hence the expanded CC list. The patches are now based on the current iommu/core branch to take John's iommu_set_dma_strict() cleanup into account. The series remiains in two (or possibly 3) logical parts - for people CC'd on cookie cleanup patches, the later parts should not affect you since your drivers don't implement non-strict mode anyway; the cleanup is all pretty straightforward, but please do yell at me if I've managed to let a silly mistake slip through and broken your driver. This time I have also build-tested x86 as well as arm64 :)I have tested those patchset on ARM64 with SMMUV3, and the testcases are as follows: - Boot with iommu.strict=0, running fio and it works well; - Boot with iommu.strict=1, running fio and it works well; - Change strict mode to lazy mode when building, the change takes effect; - Boot without iommu.strict(default strict mode), change the sysfs interface type from DMA to DMA-FQ dynamically during running fio, and it works well; - Boot without iommu.strict(default strict mode), change the sysfs interface type from DMA-FQ to DMA dynamically, and it is not allowed and print "Device or resource busy" (i know it is qualified, and we can change no-strict mode to strict by unbind the driver -> change the sysfs interface (type)->bind the driver (tested this and it works well), but i have a small question: is it also possible to change from DMA-FQ to DMA dynamically? )As patch #22 mentions, I think it's possible in principle, but it's certainly trickier. When enabling a flush queue, it doesn't matter if it takes a while for other threads to notice that cookie->fq_domain is now set and stop doing synchronous invalidations (and in the SMMU case it seems like there are probably enough dependencies to additionally prevent the io_pgtable quirk being observable before that). However when disabling, we'd need to be absolutely sure that the driver *has* started invalidating strictly before we stop queueing freed IOVAs, plus we need to be absolutely sure that we've stopped queueing freed IOVAs before we attempt to tear down the flush queue itself. I'm not sure off-hand how feasible it would be to put all that synchronisation in the right places without it also impacting normal operation. Furthermore, as also noted, there doesn't seem to be a good reason for ever actually needing to do that. If a device isn't trusted, it should be given a strict domain *before* any driver has a chance to start doing anything, or your trust model is broken and pretty useless. I can imagine some niche debugging/benchmarking cases where it might help save a bit of effort, but nothing with a strong enough justification to be worth supporting in mainline.
Ok, thanks.
quoted
Anyway, please feel free to add : Tested-by: Xiang Chen <redacted>That's great, thanks! Robin.quoted
quoted
Changes in v2: - Add iommu_is_dma_domain() helper to abstract flag check (and help avoid silly typos like the one in v1). - Tweak a few commit messages for spelling and (hopefully) clarity. - Move the iommu_create_device_direct_mappings() update to patch #14 where it should have been. - Rewrite patch #20 as a conversion of the now-existing option. - Clean up the ops->flush_iotlb_all check which is also made redundant by the new domain type - Add patch #24, which is arguably tangential, but it was something I spotted during the rebase, so... Once again, the whole lot is available on a branch here: https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-rm/-/tree/iommu/fq Thanks, Robin. CC: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> CC: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> CC: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> CC: Chunyan Zhang <redacted> CC: Chunyan Zhang <redacted> CC: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> CC: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> Robin Murphy (24): iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/arm-smmu: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/vt-d: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/exynos: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/mtk: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/rockchip: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/sprd: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/sun50i: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/virtio: Drop IOVA cookie management iommu/dma: Unexport IOVA cookie management iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types iommu/arm-smmu: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types iommu/vt-d: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs iommu: Merge strictness and domain type configs iommu/dma: Factor out flush queue init iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically iommu/arm-smmu: Allow non-strict in pgtable_quirks interface iommu: Only log strictness for DMA domains .../ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-iommu_groups | 2 + drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 80 +++++++++---------- drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 21 +---- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 25 ++++-- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 29 ++++--- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c | 8 -- drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 44 +++++----- drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 18 +---- drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 23 ++---- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 53 +++++++----- drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 27 +------ drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 6 -- drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 11 +-- drivers/iommu/sprd-iommu.c | 6 -- drivers/iommu/sun50i-iommu.c | 12 +-- drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 8 -- include/linux/dma-iommu.h | 9 ++- include/linux/iommu.h | 15 +++- 18 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-).
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel