Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2021-07-29

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add FF-A support in OP-TEE driver

From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-07-28 06:41:10
Also in: lkml, op-tee

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:13 AM Sumit Garg [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 20:55, Jens Wiklander [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Sumit,

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 1:41 PM Sumit Garg [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 16:25, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 03:59:36PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
quoted
Hi Jens,

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 17:48, Jens Wiklander [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

This adds supports for the OP-TEE driver to communicate with secure world
using FF-A [1] as transport.

There is one change to the TEE subsystem with "tee: add sec_world_id to
struct tee_shm" to add support for holding globally unique handle assigned
by the FF-A. This is a field that I believe could useful for the AMDTEE
driver too.

For communication the OP-TEE message protocol is still used, but with a new
type of memory reference, struct optee_msg_param_fmem, to carry the
information needed by FF-A. The OP-TEE driver is refactored internally with
to sets of callbacks, one for the old SMC based communication and another
set with FF-A as transport. The functions relating to the SMC based ABI
are moved to smc_abi.c while the FF-A based ABI is added in a ffa_abi.c.

There is also a difference in how the drivers are instantiated. With the
SMC based transport we have a platform driver, module_platform_driver(),
today which we're keeping as is for this configuration. In a FF-A system we
have a FF-A driver, module_ffa_driver(), instead.

The OP-TEE driver can be compiled for both targets at the same time and
it's up to runtime configuration (device tree or ACPI) to decide how it's
initialized. Note that it's only the old SMC based driver instance that
need device tree or ACPI to initialize. The FF-A based driver relies on the
FF-A bus instead.

This can be tested QEMU
The repo for SPMC at S-EL1 retrieved by
repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m
qemu_v8.xml -b ffav4_spmc
repo sync
# Then checkout the branch optee_ffa_v3 from
# git://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git
# in the linux directory

To build do:
cd build
make toolchains
make all

To boot:
make run-only

Test with xtest, perhaps only with the command "xtest 1004" in case you're
not interested in too many tests.
Thanks Jens for sharing instructions to test this feature. So I tried
to reproduce using following repo versions:

linux-tee, branch: optee_ffa_v3
trusted-firmware-a, branch: ffav4_sel1_spmc
build, branch: ffav4_spmc

and rest of the repos synced to the latest version as per upstream
qemu_v8.xml [1] but I don't see OP-TEE driver being probed during boot
[2]. Am I missing something?

[1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/blob/master/qemu_v8.xml
[2]
Welcome to Buildroot, type root or test to login
buildroot login: root
# dmesg | grep optee
Do you see ARM FF-A driver initialised successfully ?
You must see "ARM FF-A Version 1.0 found" or something similar based on
the actual version supported.

If so, can you check if the partitions are correctly populated by
the driver using the discover API.

$ grep "" /sys/bus/arm_ffa/devices/*/uuid

If uuid reads zeros, then the devices are populated, just the matching
driver is not found(due to the workaround for v1.0 spec)
It turns out to be an issue with my build environment, I re-built from
scratch and I could see OP-TEE being probed successfully:

# dmesg | grep FF-A
[    0.356382] ARM FF-A: Version 1.0 found
#
# cat /sys/bus/arm_ffa/devices/arm-ffa-8001/uuid
486178e0-e7f8-11e3-bc5e-0002a5d5c51b
#
# dmesg | grep optee
[    4.991472] optee: revision 3.14 (49dbb9ef)
[    5.010110] optee: initialized driver
#
That's good.
quoted
From xtest logs it looks like the pseudo TA interface isn't working for me:

* regression_1001 Core self tests
 - 1001 -   skip test, pseudo TA not found
  regression_1001 OK

* regression_1002 PTA parameters
 - 1002 -   skip test, pseudo TA not found
  regression_1002 OK

* regression_1003 Core internal read/write mutex
 - 1003 -   skip test, pseudo TA not found
  regression_1003 OK
The test PTAs are disabled by default.
Ah, I missed the CFG_ENABLE_EMBEDDED_TESTS option in OP-TEE. BTW, I
think it should be enabled for OP-TEE Qemu build as we mostly use it
as a test platform.
That makes sense. Perhaps in the build git?
quoted
quoted
Similarly, pseudo TAs acting as TEE bus devices doesn't work as well
as I see following devices directory being empty:

# ls /sys/bus/tee/devices/
#

As otherwise with OP-TEE SMC ABI, we should have at least the default
pseudo TA [1] kernel device there.

So is pseudo TA functional with this new FF-A interface?
Yes, everything is supposed to work.
So yes, xtest and TEE kernel bus framework works for me as well with
this new FF-A interface. FWIW:

Tested-by: Sumit Garg <redacted>
Thanks for confirming.

Cheers,
Jens

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help