Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] staging: vchiq: Make creation of vchiq cdev optional
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-27 16:55:42
Also in:
linux-staging, lkml
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:25:01PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:50:52PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:quoted
Before this commit, vchiq cdev (/dev/vchiq) was always created during platform initialization. Introduce a new Kconfig option CONFIG_VCHIQ_CDEV which determines if the cdev will be created or not. Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <redacted> --- drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile | 5 ++++- .../vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h | 9 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig index 4b886293f198..63caa6818d37 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Kconfig@@ -19,6 +19,16 @@ config BCM2835_VCHIQ Defaults to Y when the Broadcom Videocore services are included in the build, N otherwise. +if BCM2835_VCHIQ + +config VCHIQ_CDEV + bool "VCHIQ Character Driver" + help + Enable the creation of VCHIQ character driver to help + communicate with the Videocore platform.I'll take this, but this really should say more about what this really is for. Who needs this? Why will I know if I want a character driver interface? What tools talk to this? Or conversely, why would I want to turn this off? Can you send a follow-on patch that makes this more descriptive?
Hello Greg, Sure, I can send in a follow up patch explaining this in more detail. Thank you, Ojaswin
thanks, greg k-h
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel