Hi, Frank:

Frank Wunderlich [off-list ref] 於 2021年7月25日 週日 上午1:06寫道：

quoted

On 12.07.21 19:16, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

quoted

Hi,

it turns out that problem is the read+or of the new value

i reverted my patch and changed

reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr) | routes[i].val;
writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);

to

writel_relaxed(routes[i].val, mmsys->regs + routes[i].addr);

and it works too, but maybe it breaks other platforms

A gentle ping. Amy further comments which of both ways is the right one (restoring old output select function or write only without read+or)?

As I've discussed in [1], SOUT has many bits and need to be cleared
before set new value. Of course, write only could do the clear, but
for MOUT, it clear the bits that should not be cleared. If you want to
use the table, you need to implement the 'mask'.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/trinity-937ebfa3-d123-42de-a289-3ad0dbc09782-1625830110576@3c-app-gmx-bap43/

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

regards Frank

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel