Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding
From: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-23 11:14:03
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi Jason, Thank you for your patch. Missatge de jason-jh.lin [off-list ref] del dia dj., 22 de jul. 2021 a les 11:26:
There are 2 display hardware path in mt8195, namely vdosys0 and vdosys1, so add their definition in mtk-mmsys documentation.
Just having 2 display hardware paths is not a reason to have two compatibles, isn't the IP block the same? Why do you need to introduce the two compatibles? Thanks, Enric
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <redacted> --- this patch is base on [1][2] [1] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: convert to YAML format - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210519161847.3747352-1-fparent@baylibre.com/ [2] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add MT8365 SoC binding - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210519161847.3747352-2-fparent@baylibre.com/ --- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml index 2d4ff0ce387b..0789a9614f12 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ properties: - mediatek,mt8173-mmsys - mediatek,mt8183-mmsys - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys0 + - mediatek,mt8195-vdosys1 - const: syscon - items: - const: mediatek,mt7623-mmsys --2.18.0
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel