Re: [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared
From: Quentin Perret <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-19 17:59:57
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
On Monday 19 Jul 2021 at 16:01:40 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:47:30 +0100, Quentin Perret [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+static int finalize_mappings(void) +{ + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX; + int ret; + + /* + * The host's .bss and .rodata sections are now conceptually owned by + * the hypervisor, so mark them as 'borrowed' in the host stage-2. We + * can safely use host_stage2_idmap_locked() at this point since the + * host stage-2 has not been enabled yet. + */ + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED; + ret = host_stage2_idmap_locked(__hyp_pa(__start_rodata), + __hyp_pa(__end_rodata), prot);Do we really want to map the rodata section as RWX?
I know, feels odd, but for now I think so. The host is obviously welcome to restrict things in its stage-1, but for stage-2, this is just 'memory' so far, the host is allowed to patch it if it wants too. Eventually, yes, I think we should make it RO in the host stage-2, but maybe that's for another series?
quoted
+ if (ret) + return ret; + + return host_stage2_idmap_locked(__hyp_pa(__hyp_bss_end), + __hyp_pa(__bss_stop), prot);If the 'locked' state implies SHARED+BORROWED, maybe consider moving the ORRing of the prot into host_stage2_idmap_locked()?
Ah no, sorry for the confusion, but 'locked' means that we already hold the pgtable lock. That is not actually true here, but this is a special case as only the current CPU can be messing with it at this point in time so taking the lock would just be wasted cycles.
quoted
+} + void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void) { struct kvm_host_data *host_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);@@ -167,6 +199,10 @@ void __noreturn __pkvm_init_finalise(void) if (ret) goto out; + ret = finalize_mappings(); + if (ret) + goto out; + pkvm_pgtable_mm_ops = (struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops) { .zalloc_page = hyp_zalloc_hyp_page, .phys_to_virt = hyp_phys_to_virt,
Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel